Fucking seaping cock

The population of Muslims finally did a turn-a-round from slaughtering all once they realized stealing Christian lands meant they actually had to labor themselves to produce crops. Heaven forbid when the Christians could be allowed to live and then do the labor for the Muslims.

Stop encouraging him Mo!!!

Again, no one held a gun to the heads of these homophobic bigots and forced them to start businesses open to the public. In return for obtaining a business license, you agree to follow all applicable federal, state, and local laws. Can you explain to us what Public Accommodation laws are? And why they were enacted?

"confirms to you"

That makes sense, given your initial assumption. Do you believe evil exists? Not trying to entrap you or anything. I'm just curious to see how your cosmology holds together.

3 rings is child's play... ????

Your feeling are that he was scum because he didn't believe in God the way you wanted.

Nah, they just weren't well thought out. Geez, a small start up would have nailed this real quick.

So you deflect. LOL, no proof?

That is evidence, just very bad evidence, actually, an argument from ignorance,

Well of course you are! But do us all a favor. If GOD YHWH ever tells you to wear your underwear on the outside of your pants and go shoot up a post office, speak to an actual non-invisible human being about it first. Wait, your GOD YHWH is invisible, isn?t it?

I can take most tattoos but faces...words...some things are more difficult.

"Kim signed the contract for the photo shoot. She understood the contract to be for $300.00."

again what was your point?

I've only been parcel to a few photoshoots, myself... and I've never had to pay for the shoot AND the photos. I've had people charge me to take the photos and edit, but didn't charge extra for the files.

That's silly. Everybody knows that nobody knows, you can not con me. Is it possible that the human mind is like a radio and can receive signals, "inspiration" from aliens? No way of telling, and all the experiments in the world not finding any of that could legitimately conclude otherwise, since we certainly know that the workings of the mind, intuition, creativity, dreams... are 99% a mystery. And again, I am talking about physical stuff, because the mind is a function of the brain and those other critical things I mentioned, the rest of the Universe without which our body could have no form. Whether the human mind has now or will have capabilities later that we are currently unaware of, no scientific minded person would rule out. To claim otherwise, that is religion.

I know very well of the distinction, but this has little to do with what we were discussing. You made a claim about the nature of reality with no way to prove it, you just assert it as truth. I showed you how that is in error since anyone can follow the same model of making claims of absolute knowledge of something. The Aristotelian distinction makes the same error of assuming that god is that "necessary" existent thing/being, with no point of reference other than assertion. I go back to old Hitchens who stated, "I can grant you all the miracles and you'd still be left with an empty cup", because even if we assume the "necessary thing/being" is some sort of god, you'd be in no way able to say that therefore, it is the christian one....or any other specific god for that matter. Still, there is no reason to assume a god/being to begin with without committing a logical fallacy. You are stuck in an endless loop of logical fallacies and circular reasoning and the worst part about it is, you are unwilling to engage in honest discussion about it or be humble about your level of knowledge. You want to say, "This is what I believe, but can't prove it", I'm ok with that statement, even though we still won't agree on the nature of reality. But you don't say this, you say, "I know this to be true"....don't provide any evidence though, just assert it, then sidestep any logical points or questions. It's the height of arrogance and ignorance. I'm done now.

Trump should go and encourage a huge carbon-credit tax on Guatemala ... look at all the carbon their volcano produced. Bunch of polluters.

When I drive my car, I am careful. I know that I could injure or kill some person. It is possible, no matter how careful I am. I may just turn down the AC fan, looking down for a mere second and hit a child.

Please see my extended comment below about Goedel?s Incompleteness Theorem, Social Science Epistemology, and the Scientism fallacy. There are some fun opportunities for addressing these Scientism extremists.

Again, explain to us what Public Accommodation laws are and why they were enacted.

bailing now as this may go very wrong really quick...

"The "truth" taught in any religion is as valid and true as yours."

I know you are not supposed to inflame an issue but sometimes I just cannot help my self and become an agitator and getting the discussion going.

Something tells me Churchill would throw the muslims out of England instead of coming up with inane bans on cutlery.

The only thing worse than Marmite is pineapple on pizza.

I understand what you are saying, but disagree. I think you are successfully 'preventing it from happening' if something is very infrequent. It would be inappropriate to raise the penalty on an infrequent crime as a deterrent, since something is doing that job successfully.

Sigh I can't believe you we....oh never mind you would go there.

Man is equally incapable of seeing the nothingness from which he emerges and the infinity in which he is engulfed.

Name one you can link me to.

No, it is against the law. That sentient child has rights. An abortion is legal, and a fetus has no rights. Completely different situation.

Of all the places I could pretend to be, Detroit is definitely top 5. It?s so exotic.

Oh obama is such a hero ...